Evaluation of the applicability of Industrial Engineering tools to improve Academic and Professional Training at the University of Pamplona.

Authors

  • Jonathan Summer Panqueva Universidad de Pamplona, Pamplona, Colombia.
  • Francisco Raúl Arencibia-Pardo Universidad de Pamplona, Pamplona, Colombia
  • Belisario Peña Rodríguez Universidad de Pamplona, Pamplona, Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61799/2216-0388.1614

Keywords:

Thinking, Business, Learning, Opportunities.

Abstract

When faced with the subjects of project engineering,
students of the engineering programs at the University
of Pamplona face discordance in their previous levels
of learning about concepts and objectives related to
entrepreneurship, which are incomplete or outdated.
Depending on the program of origin, this is how it
is prepared.This research work presents an analysis
of the applicability of industrial engineering tools
in the curriculum of the University of Pamplona, in
order to improve the academic and professional
training of undergraduate students.Through a
methodological approach that includes surveys of
students and graduates, interviews with professors
and a comparative analysis with reference programs,
the strengths and weaknesses of the current
curriculum are identified. The results underscore the
need to integrate more practical and entrepreneurial
components to better prepare students for the new
challenges of the labor market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] G. K, «¿Que es la Ingeniería y para qué sirve?,» [En línea]. Available: https://www.ingenieria.es/ingenieria-industrial/. [Último acceso: 15 Septiembre 2024].

[2] C. Canom, «Tendencias de la Ingeniería Industrial,» Politécnico Gran Colombiano, [En línea]. Available: https://www.poli.edu.co/blog/poliverso/tendencuas-de-la-ingenieria-industrial. [Último acceso: 15 Septiembre 2024].

[3] J. Dewey, «My Pedagogic Creed,» The School Journal, volumen 54, número 3, pp. 77-80, 1897.

[4] J. A. M. A. J. O. M. D. T. Bruce L. Johnson, A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research, The Qualitative Report", 2006.

[5] J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Sage Publications, 2003.

[6] V. L. P. Clark y J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2018.

[7] D. A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Pearson Education, 1984.

[8] H. S. Barrows, Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education, Springer, 1980.

[9] P. Drucker, Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles" (Innovación y Emprendimiento: Práctica y Principios), Harper & Row, 1985.

[10] S. Blank y E. Ries, The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses", Crown Business, 2011.

[11] S. Sarasvathy, Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise, Edward Elgar Publishing., 2008.

[12] J. Creswell y V. P. Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, SAGE Publications, 2007.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-01

Issue

Section

Artículo Originales

How to Cite

Panqueva, J. S., Arencibia-Pardo, F. R., & Peña Rodríguez, B. (2024). Evaluation of the applicability of Industrial Engineering tools to improve Academic and Professional Training at the University of Pamplona. Mundo FESC Journal, 14(29), 122-138. https://doi.org/10.61799/2216-0388.1614

Most read articles by the same author(s)