Intelligent architecture for well-being management supported by neurosignals for social ecosystems 4.0

Authors

  • Mauricio Rojas-Contreras Universidad de Pamplona
  • Jorge Omar Portilla-Jaimes Universidad de Pamplona
  • Samuel Herrera-Castillo Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana

Keywords:

Intelligent Architecture, Autonomic Cycles, Wellness Management, Virtual Organizations

Abstract

The scope of this article is to describe an intelligent architecture at the structural, functional and intelligent service levels to manage the mental, physical and spiritual well-being of higher education teachers supported by neurosignals and industry 4.0 technologies. For the methodological design of the intelligent architecture, the structural layers that make up the architectural model were identified, later the functional requirements that had to be implemented in the intelligent architecture were identified and finally the intelligent services that had to automate the well-being management processes of the patients were modeled. teachers in the area of physics and that can also be replicated to teachers from other disciplinary fields. The main result of this research is the structural and service model of intelligent architecture, which is structured in a welfare services layer and in a knowledge acquisition and management layer. In an additional decomposition level, the functionalities associated with each layer are described, particularly, the services layer encapsulates the functionalities of contextual awareness management, cyberphysical characterization management, dynamic management of support networks, intelligent treatment generator. The knowledge management and acquisition layer includes the management functionalities of repositories of emotional signals, physiological measurements, social activities, social characterization, spiritual characterization, social nodes, work profiles and contexts. Taking as reference the architectural model designed for the intelligent generation of mental, physical and spiritual treatments to improve the quality of life of teachers in the area of physics in higher education, it can be concluded that in times of pandemic the design of platforms is viable smart devices that generate automatic treatments to improve the mental, physical and spiritual indicators of teachers modeled as social nodes through industry 4.0 technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J. Tranquillo, “An Introduction to Complex Systems Making Sense of a Changing World”

J. Holland, “Sistemas Adaptativos Complejos”, 1996

J. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence, 1992

J. H. Holland, “and Spontaneous Emergence,” no. III, 2002

R. Van Der Hofstad, “Random graphs and complex networks”, 2021

A. A. Nazarenko and L. M. Camarinha-Matos, Basis for an Approach to Design Collaborative Cyber-Physical Systems, vol. 553. Springer International Publishing, 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-17771-3_16

C.-P. Lopez, M. Santorum, and J. Aguilar, “FAVO: Framework de Gestión Autónoma de Organizaciones Virtuales basado en la Industria 4.0”

M. Tsujimoto, Y. Kajikawa, J. Tomita, and Y. Matsumoto, “A review of the ecosystem concept — Towards coherent ecosystem design,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 136, pp. 49–58, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.032

T. Guggenberger, F. Möller, and T. Haarhaus, “Ecosystem types in information systems,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341188637

R. Preiser, R. Biggs, A. De Vos, and C. Folke, “Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: Organizing principles for advancing research methods and approaches,” Ecology and Society, vol. 23, no. 4, 2018, doi: 10.5751/ES-10558-230446

S. L. Vargo, M. A. Akaka, and H. Wieland, “Rethinking the process of diffusion in innovation: A service-ecosystems and institutional perspective,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 116, no. December 2018, pp. 526–534, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.038

E. M. Rogers, U. E. Medina, M. a Rivera, and C. J. Wiley, “Complex Adaptive Systems and The Diffusion of Innovations,” The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1–26, 2005

A. E. Hagsall, N. Ahituv, and N. Naveh, “Effective assimilation of technological innovation in an organization characterized ?as a Complex Adaptive System,” Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 38–58, 2019, doi: 10.24840/2183-0606_007.002_0004

K. Grumadaité, “Enabling the formation of self-organisation based industrial system", Summary of Doctoral Dissertation Social Sciences, Management ( 03S ), Kaunas University of technology, p. 40, 2018

R. J. Blomme, “Leadership, complex adaptive systems, and equivocality: The role of managers in emergent change,” Organisation Management Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 4–19, 2012, doi: 10.1080/15416518.2012.666946

P. Törnberg, “Innovation in Complex Adaptive Systems,” pp. 1–49, 2014

M. Boisot and J. Child, “Organizations as Adaptive Systems in Complex Environments: The Case of China,” Organization Science, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 237–252, 1999, doi: 10.1287/orsc.10.3.237

T. Bovaird, “Emergent strategic management and planning mechanisms in complex adaptive system,” Public Management Review, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 2008, doi: 10.1080/14719030802002741

G. Bristow and A. Healy, “Building Resilient Regions: Complex Adaptive Systems and the Role of Policy Intervention,” Raumforsch Raumordn, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 93–102, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s13147-014-0280-0

A. S. N. Burford, “How Ecosystem Structure Affects Firms’ Adaptation to Environmental Changes,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2013

W. van der Aalst, Process mining: Data science in action. 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4

J. Aguilar, M. Sánchez, J. Cordero, P. Valdiviezo-Díaz, L. Barba-Guamán, and L. Chamba-Eras, “Learning analytics tasks as services in smart classrooms,” Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 693–709, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10209-017-0525-0

K. K. H. Ng, C. H. Chen, C. K. M. Lee, J. (Roger) Jiao, and Z. X. Yang, “A systematic literature review on intelligent automation: Aligning concepts from theory, practice, and future perspectives,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 47, no. December 2020, p. 101246, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2021.101246

M. H. Huang and R. T. Rust, “Artificial Intelligence in Service,” Journal of Service Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 155–172, 2018, doi: 10.1177/1094670517752459

R. I. Ogie, S. O’Brien, and F. M. Federici, “Towards using agent-based modelling for collaborative translation of crisis information: A systematic literature review to identify the underlying attributes, behaviours, interactions, and environment of agents,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, no. July, p. 102717, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102717

L. Fiorini, “How artificial intelligence will change the future of bullion production,” 42nd International Precious Metals Institute Annual Conference, IPMI 2018, pp. 60–69, 2018

E. E. Makarius, D. Mukherjee, J. D. Fox, and A. K. Fox, “Rising with the machines: A sociotechnical framework for bringing artificial intelligence into the organization,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 120, no. November 2019, pp. 262–273, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.045

C. Guevara and R. Garcia, “MIDRA-OAA: Middleware Reflexivo Autonómico para la gestión de Objetos de Aprendizaje Adaptativos.” [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350710343

M. Sánchez, E. Exposito, and J. Aguilar, “Autonomic computing in manufacturing process coordination in industry 4.0 context,” J Ind Inf Integr, vol. 19, no. 2014, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2020.100159

Z. Zheng et al., “An overview on smart contracts: Challenges, advances and platforms,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 105, pp. 475–491, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2019.12.019

J. Yang, C. Ouyang, W. M. P. van der Aalst, A. H. M. ter Hofstede, and Y. Yu, “OrdinoR: A framework for discovering, evaluating, and analyzing organizational models using event logs,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 158, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2022.113771

V. Pasquadibisceglie, A. Appice, G. Castellano, and W. der Aalst, “PROMISE: Coupling Predictive Process Mining to Process Discovery,” Information Sciences, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.05.052

J. Ramezani and L. M. Camarinha-Matos, “A collaborative approach to resilient and antifragile business ecosystems,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 162, no. Itqm 2019, pp. 604–613, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.029

J. Ramezani and L. M. Camarinha-Matos, “A collaborative approach to resilient and antifragile business ecosystems,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 162, no. Itqm 2019, pp. 604–613, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.029

P. Graça and L. M. Camarinha-Matos, “Performance indicators for collaborative business ecosystems — Literature review and trends,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 116, pp. 237–255, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.012

P. Graca, L. M. Camarinha-Matos, and F. Ferrada, “A Model to Assess Collaboration Performance in a Collaborative Business Ecosystem,” IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 553, pp. 3–13, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-17771-3_1

Published

2021-11-01

How to Cite

Rojas-Contreras, M., Portilla-Jaimes, J. O., & Herrera-Castillo, S. . (2021). Intelligent architecture for well-being management supported by neurosignals for social ecosystems 4.0. Mundo FESC Journal, 11(s4), 134–147. Retrieved from https://www.fesc.edu.co/Revistas/OJS/index.php/mundofesc/article/view/947

Issue

Section

Articulos

Most read articles by the same author(s)